Wednesday 19 October 2016

New Chancellor

In this post in 2013 I noted the elevation of Etherton J to Chancellor and the elevation of Vos J to Vos LJ in response.

Well now its Vos LJ replacing Etherton Ch (who is now MR) to become Chancellor of the High Court and leader of the Chancery Division.  Congratulations to him...

Her Majesty The Queen has been pleased to approve the appointment of The Rt Hon Sir Geoffrey Vos as the Chancellor of the High Court with effect from 24 October 2016. This appointment follows the elevation of Sir Terence Etherton to the post of Master of the Rolls on 3 October 2016.  The Right Honorable Lord Justice Vos was called to the Bar in 1977, and took silk (QC) in 1993. He was appointed as a Justice of the High Court assigned to the Chancery Division in October 2009. Between 2005 and 2009 he was a Judge of the Courts of Appeal of Jersey and Guernsey, and a Judge of the Court of Appeal of the Cayman Islands between 2008 and 2009.  He sat as a Deputy High Court Judge from 1999 until 2009. He was the Chairman of the Chancery Bar Association from 1999 to 2001 and of the Bar Council in 2007. He was President of the European Network of Councils for the Judiciary from June 2014 to June 2016. He was appointed as a Lord Justice of Appeal in 2013.

Tuesday 13 September 2016

New Faces in the Court of Appeal

As Lord Toulson reduces the ranks of the Sup Ct by his retirement (although he joins Lord Dyson ex MR on the Supp List of Sup Ct Js) and begins his new career at 4 New Square  and as Etherton starts out as MR, and we await a new Ch, in the meantime there are some new appointments to the C of A:


Hot footing it over from being Chair of SIAC (who will replace him there?) this well respected commercial lawyer will now be a junior boy in the C of A for the short term...


Or Lancelot to his friends, who will leave behind the Ch D (there since 2007) for the C of A.   He keeps up the number of Balliol alumni in the C of A.  He is an All Souls Fellow.


Another former SIAC Chair, founder of Doughty Street Chambers, one time Chairman of the Bar and general common law judge from the QBD...


Representative from the Fam D where he has sat since 2007....


who had been lately in charge of the Breasts Implants litigation...appointed to the QBD in 2010 and former head of 7 Bedford Row...


Admitted as a Solicitor in 1981 and a Solicitor Advocate (all courts) in 1997; and made a Bencher of Middle Temple, in 2009. In 1994, he was appointed as a Parking Adjudicator and, in the same year, he became an Assistant Recorder. He became a Recorder in 1998, a Circuit Judge in 2000 and a Deputy High Court Judge in 2001. He was appointed as Chief Social Security and Child Support Commissioner in 2003, Chief Pension Appeals Commissioner in 2005, Designated Civil Judge for Wales in 2007, and became the first President of the Administrative Appeals Chamber of the Upper Tribunal in 2008. He has been a Judge of the High Court of Justice, Queen’s Bench Division, since January 2009.

Monday 12 September 2016


Imagine we are post BREXIT.  Imagine there is before the Court a UK Regulation which implemented an EU Directive - say Public Procurement - although you could choose from loads of Regs (food, employment, cars, product safety etc etc..)which I suspect will not be repealed in the short to medium term....The Court does not quite know how to interpret and apply a particular provision of the Regs.  The Court knows that the Regs were enacted to transpose the provisions of the Directive into English law.  But the Court, post-BREXIT is free of the section 3 Euro Communities Act 1972 obligation to comply with the ECJ's famous ruling in Marleasing that domestic courts have to interpret domestic law so as to comply with directives.  But should the post-BREXIT Court ignore the directive when interpreting the Regs?  Probably not, if it knows that was what the Regs were for and that was the intention behind them, then why would it not consider the directive as an interpretative aid?  And then say the CJEU had recently come out with a decision which clarifies what the directive means in a material aspect?  Is the post-BREXIT Court not likely to do what it did pre-BREXIT i.e. Effectively apply directives and CJEU judgments?  BREXIT means....?

Friday 19 August 2016

New Chief Coroner

The Lord Chief Justice, after consultation with the Lord Chancellor, has appointed His Honour Judge Mark Lucraft QC as the Chief Coroner of England and Wales with effect from 1 October 2016 for a three year term. He will take over from His Honour Judge Peter Thornton QC who retires in October.

But who is he - here is something from his local newspaper when he was first appointed a Circuit Judge-  but has he ever sat as a Coroner (like his predecessor) or even appeared before one?  Can't see any sign of that - seems a bit odd?

Speaking on his first full day at Norwich Crown Court since being called to the circuit bench, Judge Mark Lucraft said judges had been given a more human face over his 27 years in the legal profession and he said it was important for them to consider the human effects in cases they dealt with.
Judge Lucraft said: “Judges are human beings and sometimes they give the impression they are aloof from the society they are part of. I would like to think judges have become more human, or given a human face.”
Judge Lucraft also gave his backing to plans to make the court system more hi-tech.
Norwich Crown Court was one of the first courts in the country to trial a “paperless” system in December, and Judge Lucraft said he would use his laptop and iPad in court.
He said: “If you look around to most other industries, most have had to adapt to modern technology and go digital. I’m all in favour of it.” 
Judge Lucraft has joined the Norwich Crown Court from London chambers, 18 Red Lion Court, where he worked as a barrister on some of the most high profile cases in the country.
He was part of the team investigating fraud following the death of Robert Maxwell – the media mogul and former MP who was found dead in 1991 by his luxury yacht in the Canary Islands.
He said: “I was instructed about a week after he disappeared. It was the most interesting case I dealt with.”
The 50-year-old was involved with the Maxwell case for seven years and also worked on the investigation into allegations British Airways and Virgin Atlantic were price fixing passenger fuel surcharges.
In 2007 BA admitted it had colluded with Virgin Atlantic in fixing the charges on long haul flights from August 2004 to January 2006.
BA was fined £121.5m which was reduced to £58.5m, while Virgin escaped without a fine after reporting the scandal to Office of Fair Trading.
He was also instructed to prosecute manslaughter and health and safety charges from the Hatfield rail crash in October 2000, in which four people died and 120 were injured.
Born in Southend, he studied law at Canterbury and went on to law school to study to be a barrister.
Judge Lucraft was called to the bar in 1985 and spent most of his career specialising in fraud cases and road accidents.
He applied to become a judge after his experiences of hearing cases as a recorder.
He said: “I have sat quite a bit as a recorder and I enjoyed the challenge of sitting. 
“It is very different from being a barrister.”
Judge Lucraft will commute each day from Ely, where he lives with his wife and three sons, aged 23, 21 and 17.
He said: “I’m expecting to see the complete range of criminal offences that take place in Norfolk.”
In a speech at the court on Wednesday, Judge Nicholas Coleman welcomed the “injection of fresh judicial blood”.
With Judge Alasdair Darroch and Judge Peter Jacobs, recorder of Norwich, nearing retirement, more changes at Norwich Crown Court are likely.
Judge Coleman said: “We all hope, and indeed expect, you will embrace and continue all that is good in the administration of justice of this renowned crown court.
“We all recognise that times are difficult.
“Court staff numbers are reduced. The bar is under pressure. Yet through it the system doggedly persists in delivering first class justice. I’m sure you will contribute handsomely to that precious commodity which we all hold dear – namely a fair trial for all accused, no matter what they are said to have done.”

Tuesday 16 August 2016


Bonjour Tristesse, Bonjour Brexit.

Jonathan Freeland has written in the holiday edition of the New York Review of Books that :

"[the 48%] are realising that though they never had much affection for the institutions of the EU, they were attached to what British membership meant for them: a society that was open, not closed, that was accepting of diversity and pluralism, and that offered its young the chance to live, work, or fall in love in any one of twenty-eight countries".

I am one such remainer who has wept into his Italian coffee lamenting the end of the 60 year experiment in Euro integration which has been brought crashing to the buffers by a marginal majority of his fellow country men and women.  Freeland suggests that so many voted to leave because they had nothing more to lose because of their state of economic woes.  It is however, a tragic indictment of society when so many people do not understand where the country's wealth comes from.  Whilst they might be unemployed, living in less than affluent areas, dependent on benefits and jealous of the immigrant workers apparently employed and earning in their stead, nevertheless to bight the hand that feeds them (like the Welsh villagers with massive signs at the entry to their burgh which proclaims how its recent innovations were made viable by massive EU funding or the Lincolnshire country dwellers who voted to leave the Common Agricultural Policy because of the Polish fruit packers stealing their jobs and spouses...) is a ludicrous act of folly.

What we must do now, however, is to ensure that what remains is not so bad.  We must demand the re-enacting by Parliament of all of the EU Laws from which we have benefited for so many years.  The Equality Act, the Food and Product safety regime, the free movement of people, goods and services and mutual recognition of civil and criminal judgments, warrants and sentences.  Whether we join EFTA or make our own way with Brussels, we must do so.  We are no longer (and in truth were never) an Island which could make our own way.  Even the Empire was a series of mutual bilateral relationships with local rulers and ruling classes who acquiesced in British sovereignty (and as soon as they didn't, they became independent) which formed a massive free market which was required to provide remittances back to the motherland, which could not itself consume all that was being produced at home.  It was the end of Empire and its market that put us in the way of the Common Market to begin with.

Put another way we need markets into which sell the expensive goods and services which cannot be all consumed at home.  For example, the law firms and investment banks cannot all serve the people and commerces of the U.K. They need bigger international markets and that is why membership of the EU, for all of its downsides (which were not few) was absolutely necessary.  Think of all the people employed by these massive monoliths who are dependent on open international markets.  I am sorry that not all of the population can benefit directly from these rich corporations and firms, but the collective act of spite, to vote to leave because others are prospering ring and you are not, is to lop of one's noise at the terrible cost of the whole visage.  It is all to fail to understand that it is the taxation on the profits of those international businesses domiciled in the UK who pay the benefits upon which quite a lot of Leavers rely on.

But it is time to wipe away our tears and our cast aside our sadness, Abientot Tristesse.  We must now work hard, all of us, to ensure the best of a very bad job.  We must remain as close to the EU and it's open markets as we can.  We must look for opportunities elsewhere, in the East and in the US and we must keep feeding the voracious service industries on which all of us depend.  There is no point pining for industry and manufacturing when all of our wealth comes from elsewhere.  We must also keep our borders, our art, our culture and our hearts open.  We must no close ourselves down and give in to the hate and racism which appears (at least to journalists, a 500% increase in hate crimes according to Freeland, and Facebook posters) to be on the rise - if it is on the rise, then we all have an obligation to stop it in its tracks and tracts.  We must maintain our liberal society and must not retreat into our own physical and metaphorical borders.

 I say "we", because the time for complacency in the metropolitan bourgeoisie might be coming to an end.  We might have to join political parties and associations, we might have to do something, because when did nothing, little or at the very least not enough, we lost something and we better make sure we do not lose anything more or, worse case scenario, everything.  So it is time to forgive the 52%, to find out what they need to feel vindicated, and then to work out a compromise which brings them the economic security they feel that the EU robbed them of, whilst stopping them from throwing the liberal baby out with the EU bath water.  Apparently some of them are in a state of Regrexit.

So when we are back from which ever corner of the free sunny world we have retreated to in order to lick our wounds, it is time, mes comrades, for action.  Not sure what and not sure when, but I am sure that it is time to break out of our cosmopolitan bubble, to see what is actually going on and to take some unspecific but yet decisive action (I'll have to polish off my bottle of Aperol before I have worked out what we should do)

Freeland says: "A whirlwind has torn through Britian, exposing rifts that have to be healed and destroying much that was precious.  And no one seems to have any idea when, how, or if it can ever be made whole again" Well I don't know either, but I am prepared to give working it out a bit  of a go.  The Future started yesterday and we are already Late.


Thursday 4 August 2016

High Court hellos and good byes

Mrs Justice Jefford

Nerys Jefford QC, construction and engineering specialist from Keating - surely destined for the TCC?  Apparently appointed consequential upon Laws LJ's retirement which does not make immediate sense, but I guess we are waiting on some C of A appointments which means there will be promotions from the High Court, thus making a space for Jefford J?

Mrs Justice O'Farrell

Another Keating construction female QC surely destined for the Rolls Building?  Yep! To replace the reduction in numbers caused by Etherton C becoming Etherton MR and therefore the need for a new Chancellor, who I don't think has been named yet?

Mr Justice Lavender

As in the well known commercial QC from Serle?  Yes  Replacing Mr Justice Saunders who is retiring.

Mr Justice Morris

Stephen Nathan Morris QC from 20 Essex Street, an EU specialist just in time for BREXIT!  To replace Cooke J who is retiring.

Saturday 25 June 2016

We cannot leave the EU - SIGN THIS PETITION (PLEASE) NOW!